Jan 1, 2012 12:00 PM

Upside Down in 2011

The Tax Court addressed important valuation issues last year, but its conclusions left many advisors hoping they'd wake up to the opposite result the next day

When Superman was trapped in “Bizarro World,” he found everything was the opposite of its earthly counterpart. Or, as Jerry Seinfeld observed, for an inhabitant of Bizarro World, “Up is down, down is up, he says ‘hello’ when he leaves, ‘goodbye’ when he arrives.”1 Several long-standing valuation issues were subject to a type of “up is down” treatment in 2011.

The Tax Court continues to say “no” to tax-affecting the value of S corporation earnings (that is, discounting the value of those earnings on the basis of assumed future tax burdens imposed on them) and the valuation community just as persistently says “yes” to tax-affecting the earnings. This conflict in approaches has existed for more than a decade. In the 1999 ruling Walter L. Gross, Jr. et al. v. Commissioner,2 the court determined that a Cincinnati-based soft drink distributor was properly valued by not tax-affecting its S corporation earnings and applying a market-derived multiple. Since Gross was decided, valuation professionals have devoted considerable efforts to assessing the valuation impact of tax benefits derived by S corporation shareholders — avoiding a double layer of taxes on distributions received and getting a stock basis step up on earnings retained by the corporation. The general consensus among professionals is to value an S corporation by tax-affecting its earnings as if it were a C corporation and then make an upward adjustment to its shares by the incremental value associated with the specific tax benefits received by the S corporation shareholder.

Sign in to
view the full article



Remember Me

* Forgot Username/Password?

* Magazine Subscribers Get Your Login

Not a subscriber?

  • Subscribe & Save

    Get immediate access to Trust & Estates online
  • Subscriber Benefits

    Learn more about Trust & Estates magazine, online article access and our free enewsletters.

Topics of Interest

Estate Tax Donor Advised Funds
GSTs Family Offices
Private Foundations Life Insurance
2010 Tax Act News Industry Trends Surveys

E-Newsletter Signup

Poll

Topics of Interest

Estate Tax Donor Advised Funds
GSTs Family Offices
Private Foundations Life Insurance
2010 Tax Act News Industry Trends Surveys

E-Newsletter Signup


T&E eNewsletters

Wealth Watch

Wealth Watch is a free e-newsletter delivered twice a month with expert advice on wealth management from Trusts & Estates.

Latest from Wealth Watch

View more from Wealth Watch.

Tech. Review

Technology Review is a free monthly e-newsletter from Trusts & Estates and nationally renowned expert Donald H. Kelley. It is geared to keeping estate planning lawyers current on the latest tech news they can use.

Latest from Tech. Review

View More from Technology Review.

Philanthropy Tax Guide

Each month, Conrad Teitell reports on and analyzes as important tax development governing charitable contributions, including how to maximize the benefits and avoid the pitfalls.

Latest from Conrad Teitell

View More from Conrad Teitell.

2011 Trust Glossary

Click here to download the 2011 Trust Glossary

50 Years Ago This Month

50 years ago, in May 1962, we featured articles such as: "Future of Canadian Trusteeship" by Arthur H. Mingay", "Training Trust Employees" by Ian M. Marr, "What is a Trust Officer?" by Eric J. Brown, and "Selling Services" by Donald I. Webb.

Conrad Teitell's Guide to Tax Benefits For Charitable Gifts

Click here to view the most up to date guide (September 2011)

Press Releases

Browse Back Issues

What's new on
WealthManagement.com


Most Popular Stories

Press Releases

Advising the Wealthy: It's a Whole New Game

Charlie Ratner talks with estate-planning expert Lou Harrison, investment guru Michael Lewitt and retirement benefits specialist Mike Jones. Register for this timely podcast......

Follow us on Twitter