Beneficiary-Controlled Trusts Can Lose Asset Protection

Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM, By Charles Harris, partner, and Tye J. Klooster, associate, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago

By: By Charles Harris, partner, and Tye J. Klooster, associate, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago

Advisors promote trusts as an indispensable component of the estate plan. We tout the importance of trusts for credit shelter and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax planning. We proclaim that trusts protect assets from creditors, including insatiable divorce creditors. Meanwhile, many of our clients are worried that inheritances will get tied up in trust, complicating beneficiaries' lives. In the past, there was a solution: the beneficiary-controlled trust that gave beneficiaries a fair amount of control, yet still provided crucial tax and creditor protection.

The beneficiary-controlled trust proliferated dramatically in recent years — and no wonder. In it, the current beneficiary is named as the sole trustee; has the power, in his sole discretion, to make distributions of income and/or principal to himself under the health, education, support and maintenance (HESM) standard of Internal Revenue Code Section 2041 and Treasury Regulations rules,1 and has a limited power to appoint trust assets to anyone other than the beneficiary.2

T&E Premium Content

To read the rest of this article, please login to our Premium Content section:

Registered Web Site Users
User Name:
Password:
Remember Me

Note from the Editor

Rorie Sherman, Editor in Chief

Trusts & Estates is the town center where experts who serve the planning needs of the ultra-wealthy gather to gain insight into their specialties and to learn about related professions. Community members include estate-planning lawyers, corporate and individual trustees, financial planners, accountants, investment advisors, charitable giving specialists, family office executives, insurance agents, valuation experts and the like....More about us



T&E edit guidelines / T&E advisory board members