Reconsider the GRIT

Dec 1, 2005 12:00 PM, By Mark W. Smith, attorney, Holland & Knight LLP, New York

By: By Mark W. Smith, attorney, Holland & Knight LLP, New York

The enactment of Internal Revenue Code Section 27021 in 1990 sounded a virtual death knell for the grantor retained income trust (GRIT). The GRIT fell into disuse, so much so that it is often overlooked even in the few circumstances that its use is still tolerated by the IRC.

It's time to revisit the GRIT — particularly because, by applying a little imagination, advisors can use it to the significant advantage of domestic partners, who cannot avail themselves of the unlimited marital deduction from gift and estate taxes. GRIT planning is appropriate for all types of unmarried couples, of course, but it's most needed by same-sex couples for whom federally recognized marriage is not an option.

T&E Premium Content

To read the rest of this article, please login to our Premium Content section:

Registered Web Site Users
User Name:
Password:
Remember Me

Note from the Editor

Rorie Sherman, Editor in Chief

Trusts & Estates is the town center where experts who serve the planning needs of the ultra-wealthy gather to gain insight into their specialties and to learn about related professions. Community members include estate-planning lawyers, corporate and individual trustees, financial planners, accountants, investment advisors, charitable giving specialists, family office executives, insurance agents, valuation experts and the like....More about us



T&E edit guidelines / T&E advisory board members