advertisement
Jan 1, 2005 12:00 PM
Atkinson Lessons
The implications of a case handed two years ago have not been adequately appreciated by practitioners.
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Oct. 16, 2002, affirmed a decision of the Tax Court denying an estate tax deduction for a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) that had not been administered according to the terms of a trust. In Atkinson v. Comm'r,
Sign in to
view the full article
Not a subscriber?
Subscribe & Save
Get immediate access to Trust & Estates onlineSubscriber Benefits
Learn more about Trust & Estates magazine, online article access and our free enewsletters.
New on the Web
Conrad Teitell's Guide to Tax Benefits For Charitable Gifts (Updated August 2010)
America's Top 100 Independent B/D Advisors
Seminar: Estate Planning for NYC Residential Building Owners - Register Now by clicking here
Program Co-Sponsored by Trusts & Estates Magazine, the Rent Stabilization Association (RSA), and New York County Lawyers Association (NYCLA) Trusts & Estates Section
Panelists will include attorneys specializing in real estate and estate planning.
Moderators: Robin A. Bernstein, Esq., RSA Deputy Counsel; Susan Lipp, Esq., Editor-in-Chief, Trusts & Estates Magazine; Sylvia E. DiPietro, Esq., Chair, NYCLA Estates Trusts & Estates Section
Wealth Watch E-Letter Subscribe
Fate of Famed Art Collection Unresolved
Tennessee Chancery Court temporarily blocks the sale by financially strapped college of a 50 percent interest to a Walmart heiress’ new museum...
The Shifting Sands of the Tax Burden
A U.S. Court of Appeals ruling underscores the importance of paying attention to the tax implications of selling or transferring property before a testator’s death...
advertisement
Bookstore / Library
advertisement
Tech E-Letter Subscribe
Gsphere
Comprehensive analysis of investment diversification...
VestingPoint.com’s Retirement Calculator
Evaluate retirement projections with this online tool...
advertisement






