advertisement
Jan 1, 2005 12:00 PM
Atkinson Lessons
The implications of a case handed two years ago have not been adequately appreciated by practitioners.
The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Oct. 16, 2002, affirmed a decision of the Tax Court denying an estate tax deduction for a charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) that had not been administered according to the terms of a trust. In Atkinson v. Comm'r,
Sign in to
view the full article
Not a subscriber?
Subscribe & Save
Get immediate access to Trust & Estates onlineSubscriber Benefits
Learn more about Trust & Estates magazine, online article access and our free enewsletters.
Wealth Watch E-Letter Subscribe
Build a Better Endowment
Solid university endowments can survive economic storms...
A Pitch for Privacy Rights
Milwaukee Brewers relief pitcher asks court to seal the records of his wife’s cocaine-related death...
advertisement
Bookstore / Library
advertisement
Tech E-Letter Subscribe
Accruit
Streamlining the management of like-kind exchanges...
Analyzing ILITs
InKnowVision has a spreadsheet-based software that helps wealth planners look at irrevocable life insurance trusts...
advertisement






